<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (1) TMI 66 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149738</link>
    <description>Inflated figures stated in an application to another department did not, by themselves, establish suppression of taxable turnover under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, where the books correctly recorded the raw material received and used and the allotments granted were duly accounted for. The exaggeration was used only to seek a higher import quota and was not accepted by the granting authority. Moral impropriety in a separate application was held insufficient to justify reassessment or penalty on a theory of escaped assessment, and concluded assessments could not be reopened on mere suspicion when no material supported suppression.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:58:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (1) TMI 66 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149738</link>
      <description>Inflated figures stated in an application to another department did not, by themselves, establish suppression of taxable turnover under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, where the books correctly recorded the raw material received and used and the allotments granted were duly accounted for. The exaggeration was used only to seek a higher import quota and was not accepted by the granting authority. Moral impropriety in a separate application was held insufficient to justify reassessment or penalty on a theory of escaped assessment, and concluded assessments could not be reopened on mere suspicion when no material supported suppression.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>