<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (6) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148734</link>
    <description>Sale of jaggery was treated as taxable under the Madras Agricultural Produce Markets Act, and the Madras General Sales Tax Act was also held applicable. Jaggery was not regarded as agricultural produce for the purposes of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, so the challenge to dual levy failed and the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:21:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (6) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148734</link>
      <description>Sale of jaggery was treated as taxable under the Madras Agricultural Produce Markets Act, and the Madras General Sales Tax Act was also held applicable. Jaggery was not regarded as agricultural produce for the purposes of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, so the challenge to dual levy failed and the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>