<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (9) TMI 99 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148730</link>
    <description>The appellate scheme under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 requires the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal to decide appeals on merits and to pass substantive orders such as confirming, reducing, enhancing or annulling assessments, or remitting matters for fresh assessment. A procedural regulation may govern hearing and business, but it cannot enlarge the Tribunal&#039;s powers or permit dismissal of a duly filed appeal for non-appearance. On that reading, a rule authorising dismissal for default is inconsistent with the Act and beyond the delegated rule-making power. The Tribunal therefore lacks jurisdiction to dispose of the appeal merely for want of appearance, and the appeal must be decided on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 16:56:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (9) TMI 99 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148730</link>
      <description>The appellate scheme under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 requires the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal to decide appeals on merits and to pass substantive orders such as confirming, reducing, enhancing or annulling assessments, or remitting matters for fresh assessment. A procedural regulation may govern hearing and business, but it cannot enlarge the Tribunal&#039;s powers or permit dismissal of a duly filed appeal for non-appearance. On that reading, a rule authorising dismissal for default is inconsistent with the Act and beyond the delegated rule-making power. The Tribunal therefore lacks jurisdiction to dispose of the appeal merely for want of appearance, and the appeal must be decided on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>