<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (2) TMI 166 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148699</link>
    <description>Sales tax collected from purchasers was held to be a trading receipt where it was not kept as a separate deposit, was mixed with the assessee&#039;s business funds, and was treated in the books as part of business liabilities rather than as money held outside the business. The decisive factor was the manner of receipt and treatment at collection, not merely a possible contingent obligation to refund or deposit the amount. The court distinguished cases where tax is separately received and retained for the Government or for refund, in which no beneficial interest accrues to the dealer. On these facts, the amount was includible in total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 12:21:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (2) TMI 166 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148699</link>
      <description>Sales tax collected from purchasers was held to be a trading receipt where it was not kept as a separate deposit, was mixed with the assessee&#039;s business funds, and was treated in the books as part of business liabilities rather than as money held outside the business. The decisive factor was the manner of receipt and treatment at collection, not merely a possible contingent obligation to refund or deposit the amount. The court distinguished cases where tax is separately received and retained for the Government or for refund, in which no beneficial interest accrues to the dealer. On these facts, the amount was includible in total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>