<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (11) TMI 95 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148646</link>
    <description>Section 27 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act gave statutory effect to the constitutional exclusion of sales outside Uttar Pradesh and, by a non obstante clause, removed such transactions from the Act&#039;s operation. On that basis, the charging provision, the definitions of sale and turnover, and the minimum-turnover proviso in section 3(1) could not be applied to include ex-U.P. sales in taxable turnover. Rule 8 of the U.P. Sales Tax Rules also could not enlarge liability by counting excluded sales in gross turnover. Sales effected outside Uttar Pradesh were therefore ignored when determining whether the dealer crossed the taxable threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:17:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (11) TMI 95 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148646</link>
      <description>Section 27 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act gave statutory effect to the constitutional exclusion of sales outside Uttar Pradesh and, by a non obstante clause, removed such transactions from the Act&#039;s operation. On that basis, the charging provision, the definitions of sale and turnover, and the minimum-turnover proviso in section 3(1) could not be applied to include ex-U.P. sales in taxable turnover. Rule 8 of the U.P. Sales Tax Rules also could not enlarge liability by counting excluded sales in gross turnover. Sales effected outside Uttar Pradesh were therefore ignored when determining whether the dealer crossed the taxable threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>