<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (6) TMI 62 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148643</link>
    <description>Retrospective validation of an assessment preserves the tax demand where tax was earlier refunded solely pursuant to a court order setting aside part of that assessment. The validating provision applied notwithstanding the earlier judicial order, while the refund was not treated as a statutory refund under the principal Act. Because the validated assessment itself continued to support the tax liability, repayment could be demanded directly without using the assessment-rectification rule. The assessee&#039;s challenge to the repayment demand failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:03:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (6) TMI 62 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148643</link>
      <description>Retrospective validation of an assessment preserves the tax demand where tax was earlier refunded solely pursuant to a court order setting aside part of that assessment. The validating provision applied notwithstanding the earlier judicial order, while the refund was not treated as a statutory refund under the principal Act. Because the validated assessment itself continued to support the tax liability, repayment could be demanded directly without using the assessment-rectification rule. The assessee&#039;s challenge to the repayment demand failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>