<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (12) TMI 87 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148638</link>
    <description>The High Court of Mysore clarified that both principals and agents can be held liable for tax payment in businesses conducted through agents, contrary to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s ruling. The Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, reinstating the assessment order by the Commercial Tax Officer and Deputy Commissioner. The judgment emphasized that statutory provisions make both principals and agents accountable for tax payment, highlighting the flawed interpretation of the first proviso to section 11 by the Tribunal. The Court&#039;s decision corrected the misinterpretation and reaffirmed the tax obligations of both parties involved in such transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:53:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (12) TMI 87 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148638</link>
      <description>The High Court of Mysore clarified that both principals and agents can be held liable for tax payment in businesses conducted through agents, contrary to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s ruling. The Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, reinstating the assessment order by the Commercial Tax Officer and Deputy Commissioner. The judgment emphasized that statutory provisions make both principals and agents accountable for tax payment, highlighting the flawed interpretation of the first proviso to section 11 by the Tribunal. The Court&#039;s decision corrected the misinterpretation and reaffirmed the tax obligations of both parties involved in such transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>