<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (5) TMI 52 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148626</link>
    <description>For the proviso to section 9(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the tax admitted by an appellant to be due is to be assessed from the position taken in the memorandum of appeal, not mechanically from the figures in the original return. The statutory scheme distinguishes the dealer&#039;s obligation to deposit tax on return turnover from the separate condition for entertaining an appeal, which depends on payment of the tax not disputed at the appellate stage. A dealer may also challenge turnover or rate earlier shown in a return if those entries were made under mistake, so the return is not conclusive for maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 12:21:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (5) TMI 52 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148626</link>
      <description>For the proviso to section 9(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the tax admitted by an appellant to be due is to be assessed from the position taken in the memorandum of appeal, not mechanically from the figures in the original return. The statutory scheme distinguishes the dealer&#039;s obligation to deposit tax on return turnover from the separate condition for entertaining an appeal, which depends on payment of the tax not disputed at the appellate stage. A dealer may also challenge turnover or rate earlier shown in a return if those entries were made under mistake, so the return is not conclusive for maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>