https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148625 The Court refused to grant a stay of operation on the judgment and/or order appealed against, stating that waiting a few more weeks would not cause harm as the appellant had already waited since July 2009 without protection. The Court directed the filing of informal paper books enclosing the cross-objection within a week. The order was passed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, emphasizing that the decision would impact the pending proceedings before the Learned Tribunal. The Court disposed of the stay application, requiring compliance with the directives in the order. en-us Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2013 12:18:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148625 The Court refused to grant a stay of operation on the judgment and/or order appealed against, stating that waiting a few more weeks would not cause harm as the appellant had already waited since July 2009 without protection. The Court directed the filing of informal paper books enclosing the cross-objection within a week. The order was passed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, emphasizing that the decision would impact the pending proceedings before the Learned Tribunal. The Court disposed of the stay application, requiring compliance with the directives in the order. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148625