<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 699 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE &amp; SERVICE TAX, (APPEALS), LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148613</link>
    <description>The Commissioner allowed the appeal, affirming the admissibility of CENVAT credit on GTA services up to the port of export. The Commissioner considered the port of export as the place of removal for export goods, supported by legal interpretations and precedents. The decision negated the demand for interest or penalty, emphasizing the belief of the Appellant in good faith based on judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 699 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE &amp; SERVICE TAX, (APPEALS), LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148613</link>
      <description>The Commissioner allowed the appeal, affirming the admissibility of CENVAT credit on GTA services up to the port of export. The Commissioner considered the port of export as the place of removal for export goods, supported by legal interpretations and precedents. The decision negated the demand for interest or penalty, emphasizing the belief of the Appellant in good faith based on judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>