<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (7) TMI 126 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148603</link>
    <description>Interest on unpaid sales tax was treated as incidental to the State&#039;s taxing power and not violative of Article 14; the challenge to the 18 per cent levy under section 8(1-A) failed. A best judgment assessment made after complete failure to file returns was held valid because the statutory scheme itself provided the opportunity and duty to file returns, so no further pre-assessment hearing was required. A stay of recovery in revision was held only to suspend collection temporarily and did not extinguish the tax liability; the assessee remained a defaulter, and recovery proceedings were not invalidated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:06:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (7) TMI 126 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148603</link>
      <description>Interest on unpaid sales tax was treated as incidental to the State&#039;s taxing power and not violative of Article 14; the challenge to the 18 per cent levy under section 8(1-A) failed. A best judgment assessment made after complete failure to file returns was held valid because the statutory scheme itself provided the opportunity and duty to file returns, so no further pre-assessment hearing was required. A stay of recovery in revision was held only to suspend collection temporarily and did not extinguish the tax liability; the assessee remained a defaulter, and recovery proceedings were not invalidated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>