<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (3) TMI 105 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148601</link>
    <description>The Court held that the turnover related to packing materials, including gunny bags, was not subject to tax. Consequently, the imposition of penalties for undisclosed packing material value was deemed unjustified. The judgment emphasized a comprehensive interpretation of relevant laws and rules, determining the non-taxability of packing materials in the context of cement supply. The petitions seeking to quash orders reopening assessments and imposing penalties were allowed, with costs awarded to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:50:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (3) TMI 105 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148601</link>
      <description>The Court held that the turnover related to packing materials, including gunny bags, was not subject to tax. Consequently, the imposition of penalties for undisclosed packing material value was deemed unjustified. The judgment emphasized a comprehensive interpretation of relevant laws and rules, determining the non-taxability of packing materials in the context of cement supply. The petitions seeking to quash orders reopening assessments and imposing penalties were allowed, with costs awarded to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>