https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148600 The Court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the legality of imposing sales tax on cane jaggery while exempting palm jaggery. It found the classification reasonable, not violating Article 14. The State's actions were deemed legal under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, with no excessive delegation of powers. The imposition of sales tax did not impede trade, constituting a valid regulatory measure. The Court concluded that the restrictions were reasonable, supporting the palm jaggery industry and the public interest. en-us Fri, 06 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:25:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148600 The Court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the legality of imposing sales tax on cane jaggery while exempting palm jaggery. It found the classification reasonable, not violating Article 14. The State's actions were deemed legal under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, with no excessive delegation of powers. The imposition of sales tax did not impede trade, constituting a valid regulatory measure. The Court concluded that the restrictions were reasonable, supporting the palm jaggery industry and the public interest. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 06 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148600