<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 672 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), PUNE-II</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148598</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute regarding liability for service tax, interest, and penalties for alleged cargo handling services provided without registration and payment of service tax. The appellants were accused of providing cargo handling services related to bagasse without proper registration or tax payment. The Assistant Commissioner initially ruled in favor of the tax authorities, but the Commissioner ultimately sided with the appellants. It was held that the appellants&#039; activities did not constitute cargo handling services, leading to the setting aside of demands, interests, and penalties imposed, with the appeals being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 672 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), PUNE-II</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148598</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute regarding liability for service tax, interest, and penalties for alleged cargo handling services provided without registration and payment of service tax. The appellants were accused of providing cargo handling services related to bagasse without proper registration or tax payment. The Assistant Commissioner initially ruled in favor of the tax authorities, but the Commissioner ultimately sided with the appellants. It was held that the appellants&#039; activities did not constitute cargo handling services, leading to the setting aside of demands, interests, and penalties imposed, with the appeals being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>