<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1090 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS),  PUNE-II</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148594</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed with the modified penalty amount reduced from Rs. 3,22,543/- to Rs. 66,600/- by the Commissioner after reviewing the case records and finding no mala fide intention on the part of the appellant. The penalty was aligned with the maximum justified amount under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, based on the circumstances of the case and the appellant&#039;s filed returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:04:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1090 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS),  PUNE-II</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148594</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed with the modified penalty amount reduced from Rs. 3,22,543/- to Rs. 66,600/- by the Commissioner after reviewing the case records and finding no mala fide intention on the part of the appellant. The penalty was aligned with the maximum justified amount under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, based on the circumstances of the case and the appellant&#039;s filed returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>