<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (12) TMI 84 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148576</link>
    <description>A subordinate sales tax authority cannot continue to enforce or appropriate tax under a provision already declared ultra vires by the High Court, because such a declaration renders the provision inoperative within its jurisdiction. Pending appellate proceedings do not permit the authority to disregard that binding declaration, and recovery of the amount from customers does not create power to make an otherwise unauthorised appropriation or demand. Where the assessing authority refuses to accept the binding legal position, relief under Article 226 is available. The appropriation under section 8-A(4) and the consequential demand were therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (12) TMI 84 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148576</link>
      <description>A subordinate sales tax authority cannot continue to enforce or appropriate tax under a provision already declared ultra vires by the High Court, because such a declaration renders the provision inoperative within its jurisdiction. Pending appellate proceedings do not permit the authority to disregard that binding declaration, and recovery of the amount from customers does not create power to make an otherwise unauthorised appropriation or demand. Where the assessing authority refuses to accept the binding legal position, relief under Article 226 is available. The appropriation under section 8-A(4) and the consequential demand were therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>