<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (7) TMI 62 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148574</link>
    <description>Under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, a notified single-point levy on mustard oil applied only to the dealer-manufacturer. The firm, as a distinct taxable unit, was the manufacturer when it produced the oil, but on dissolution the stock allotted to a partner and later sold by him in his individual business was not sold by him as the manufacturer in the statutory sense. The sale was therefore not liable to sales tax in the partner&#039;s hands, and the assessment was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:51:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (7) TMI 62 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148574</link>
      <description>Under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, a notified single-point levy on mustard oil applied only to the dealer-manufacturer. The firm, as a distinct taxable unit, was the manufacturer when it produced the oil, but on dissolution the stock allotted to a partner and later sold by him in his individual business was not sold by him as the manufacturer in the statutory sense. The sale was therefore not liable to sales tax in the partner&#039;s hands, and the assessment was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>