<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 921 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148553</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld a service tax demand of Rs. 1,52,17,562/- against the appellant for failure to include the value of steel supplied by the service receiver when claiming abatement under an exemption notification. Despite discrepancies in the service category mentioned in their returns, the Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s pre-deposit of Rs. 45 lakhs sufficient under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, allowing the stay petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:19:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 921 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148553</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld a service tax demand of Rs. 1,52,17,562/- against the appellant for failure to include the value of steel supplied by the service receiver when claiming abatement under an exemption notification. Despite discrepancies in the service category mentioned in their returns, the Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s pre-deposit of Rs. 45 lakhs sufficient under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, allowing the stay petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>