<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (8) TMI 114 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148548</link>
    <description>The characterization of printing turnover depends on the parties&#039; intention viewed as a whole and on the nature of the bargain. Where the customer is found to have contracted for and paid for a finished product, separate bill entries for labour and materials may be treated as an artificial apportionment rather than a genuine segregation of a works contract. On the facts recorded, the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the transaction was for a completed commodity was supported by the evidence, so the suggested split between labour charges and material cost was not accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:02:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (8) TMI 114 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148548</link>
      <description>The characterization of printing turnover depends on the parties&#039; intention viewed as a whole and on the nature of the bargain. Where the customer is found to have contracted for and paid for a finished product, separate bill entries for labour and materials may be treated as an artificial apportionment rather than a genuine segregation of a works contract. On the facts recorded, the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the transaction was for a completed commodity was supported by the evidence, so the suggested split between labour charges and material cost was not accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>