<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (7) TMI 57 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148507</link>
    <description>Rejection of books of account in tax assessment must rest on material evidence, not on suspicion or a mistaken shift of the burden of proof. Where disputed purchases were covered by two way-bills, the assessee&#039;s explanation linking them to entries already in the books had to be examined on its merits; in the absence of proof that the book entries did not cover the consignments, the rejection of accounts could not stand. Best judgment estimation also requires a rational factual basis: an addition to purchase turnover cannot be sustained if the figure is arbitrary and unsupported by comparative material or a disclosed basis. The assessment enhancement was therefore held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (7) TMI 57 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148507</link>
      <description>Rejection of books of account in tax assessment must rest on material evidence, not on suspicion or a mistaken shift of the burden of proof. Where disputed purchases were covered by two way-bills, the assessee&#039;s explanation linking them to entries already in the books had to be examined on its merits; in the absence of proof that the book entries did not cover the consignments, the rejection of accounts could not stand. Best judgment estimation also requires a rational factual basis: an addition to purchase turnover cannot be sustained if the figure is arbitrary and unsupported by comparative material or a disclosed basis. The assessment enhancement was therefore held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>