<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (9) TMI 97 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148503</link>
    <description>A State levy on declared goods was upheld where the charging entry fixed a single taxable stage and was read consistently with Parliament&#039;s restrictions under Article 286(3) and section 15(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act. Item 6 of Schedule III was treated as a one-point levy for each dealer class, not as authorising multiple taxation, and the millers/other dealers classification was held to rest on an intelligible differentia with a rational link to the statutory purpose. The levy could operate only subject to the Central ceiling and incidence limits, so taxation on declared goods could not exceed the permitted 3 per cent at a single stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:30:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (9) TMI 97 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148503</link>
      <description>A State levy on declared goods was upheld where the charging entry fixed a single taxable stage and was read consistently with Parliament&#039;s restrictions under Article 286(3) and section 15(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act. Item 6 of Schedule III was treated as a one-point levy for each dealer class, not as authorising multiple taxation, and the millers/other dealers classification was held to rest on an intelligible differentia with a rational link to the statutory purpose. The levy could operate only subject to the Central ceiling and incidence limits, so taxation on declared goods could not exceed the permitted 3 per cent at a single stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>