<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 834 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148497</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the applicant in the case involving denial of credit on various input services. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant based on judicial pronouncements cited, ordering a total waiver of the pre-deposit of dues demanded in the impugned order. Additionally, the Tribunal directed that no coercive measures should be taken by Revenue until the appeal is decided, and the stay order will continue even after the lapse of 180 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:50:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 834 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148497</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the applicant in the case involving denial of credit on various input services. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant based on judicial pronouncements cited, ordering a total waiver of the pre-deposit of dues demanded in the impugned order. Additionally, the Tribunal directed that no coercive measures should be taken by Revenue until the appeal is decided, and the stay order will continue even after the lapse of 180 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>