<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (4) TMI 92 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148496</link>
    <description>A taxing notification under the U.P. Sales Tax Act fixed liability for khandsari sugar only at the point of sale by the manufacturer. Although a commission agent was generally treated as a dealer and sales through him could form part of turnover, the notification confined the taxable point to the manufacturer&#039;s sale and did not extend to a commission agent acting on the manufacturer&#039;s behalf. The absence of any statutory provision creating representative liability was decisive, so the analogue of representative assessees under income-tax law did not apply. The commission agent was therefore outside the notified incidence of tax, and liability remained with the manufacturer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (4) TMI 92 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148496</link>
      <description>A taxing notification under the U.P. Sales Tax Act fixed liability for khandsari sugar only at the point of sale by the manufacturer. Although a commission agent was generally treated as a dealer and sales through him could form part of turnover, the notification confined the taxable point to the manufacturer&#039;s sale and did not extend to a commission agent acting on the manufacturer&#039;s behalf. The absence of any statutory provision creating representative liability was decisive, so the analogue of representative assessees under income-tax law did not apply. The commission agent was therefore outside the notified incidence of tax, and liability remained with the manufacturer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>