<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (1) TMI 56 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148486</link>
    <description>A taxing notification entry not specially defined must be construed in its ordinary, popular and commercial sense. Applying that approach, tooth-powder, being used for cleaning teeth and understood in trade and by consumers as a personal toilet article, falls within &quot;cosmetics and toilet requisites&quot; under entry 6 of Notification No. 905/X dated 31 March 1956. The sequence of notifications also supported this reading, as dentifrices had historically been treated as part of that category before later separate treatment. Ejusdem generis was unnecessary on these facts, and the classification was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (1) TMI 56 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148486</link>
      <description>A taxing notification entry not specially defined must be construed in its ordinary, popular and commercial sense. Applying that approach, tooth-powder, being used for cleaning teeth and understood in trade and by consumers as a personal toilet article, falls within &quot;cosmetics and toilet requisites&quot; under entry 6 of Notification No. 905/X dated 31 March 1956. The sequence of notifications also supported this reading, as dentifrices had historically been treated as part of that category before later separate treatment. Ejusdem generis was unnecessary on these facts, and the classification was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>