<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (1) TMI 54 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148473</link>
    <description>In a reassessment proceeding following a remand confined to rechecking calculations and verifying tax actually collected under section 8-A(4), the assessing authority could not expand the enquiry into a fresh assessment of the entire escaped turnover. The remand order controlled the officer&#039;s jurisdiction, and a limited remand did not authorise a de novo reassessment beyond the specified issues. Any escaped turnover had to be brought to tax through the separate statutory procedure under section 21, subject to its notice and other conditions. The authority was therefore not competent to assess enhanced or escaped turnover within the restricted remand proceedings, and the assessee succeeded on that point.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:12:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (1) TMI 54 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148473</link>
      <description>In a reassessment proceeding following a remand confined to rechecking calculations and verifying tax actually collected under section 8-A(4), the assessing authority could not expand the enquiry into a fresh assessment of the entire escaped turnover. The remand order controlled the officer&#039;s jurisdiction, and a limited remand did not authorise a de novo reassessment beyond the specified issues. Any escaped turnover had to be brought to tax through the separate statutory procedure under section 21, subject to its notice and other conditions. The authority was therefore not competent to assess enhanced or escaped turnover within the restricted remand proceedings, and the assessee succeeded on that point.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>