<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1084 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that a prima facie case existed for waiver of pre-deposit where the appellant claimed abatement under the relevant service tax notification. It found support in prior Tribunal authority and noted that the recipient of goods transport agency service could not have taken credit of capital goods or inputs. The absence of an endorsement on the consignment notes regarding non-availment of credit was not treated as defeating the appellant&#039;s claim at the interim stage. Waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted and recovery of the demanded service tax, interest and penalties was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1084 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that a prima facie case existed for waiver of pre-deposit where the appellant claimed abatement under the relevant service tax notification. It found support in prior Tribunal authority and noted that the recipient of goods transport agency service could not have taken credit of capital goods or inputs. The absence of an endorsement on the consignment notes regarding non-availment of credit was not treated as defeating the appellant&#039;s claim at the interim stage. Waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted and recovery of the demanded service tax, interest and penalties was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>