https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148456 The appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit because the service had already been classified as Business Auxiliary Service in an unchallenged order, and the impugned order followed that classification. On that basis, waiver of the service tax demand and penalties was not fully granted. The appellant was directed to deposit the entire service tax demand within four weeks, while waiver of the balance dues was allowed subject to compliance with that direction, and recovery was stayed pending the appeal. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:41:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148456 The appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit because the service had already been classified as Business Auxiliary Service in an unchallenged order, and the impugned order followed that classification. On that basis, waiver of the service tax demand and penalties was not fully granted. The appellant was directed to deposit the entire service tax demand within four weeks, while waiver of the balance dues was allowed subject to compliance with that direction, and recovery was stayed pending the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148456