<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (2) TMI 108 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148424</link>
    <description>Radio cabinets and loud-speaker cabinets were examined for classification under the Bombay Sales Tax Act as alleged spare parts of wireless reception instruments or loud-speakers. The expression &quot;spare parts&quot; was given its ordinary commercial meaning, limited to items kept for replacement in normal use or as emergency substitutes. A radio cabinet was not a spare part because it was not ordinarily understood as a replaceable component or an extra replacement item, and no other part of Entry 65 covered it. Loud-speaker cabinets were also excluded because &quot;apparatus&quot; in the entry had to be read consistently with the opening reference, which did not support treating loud-speakers as part of apparatus for this purpose. Both items therefore fell under the residuary entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 09:36:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (2) TMI 108 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148424</link>
      <description>Radio cabinets and loud-speaker cabinets were examined for classification under the Bombay Sales Tax Act as alleged spare parts of wireless reception instruments or loud-speakers. The expression &quot;spare parts&quot; was given its ordinary commercial meaning, limited to items kept for replacement in normal use or as emergency substitutes. A radio cabinet was not a spare part because it was not ordinarily understood as a replaceable component or an extra replacement item, and no other part of Entry 65 covered it. Loud-speaker cabinets were also excluded because &quot;apparatus&quot; in the entry had to be read consistently with the opening reference, which did not support treating loud-speakers as part of apparatus for this purpose. Both items therefore fell under the residuary entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>