<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1082 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148422</link>
    <description>A 26-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned after the appellant attributed it to handling of papers by counsel&#039;s staff and serious illness. On interim relief, the assessee&#039;s request for unconditional waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery failed because the contention that the construction was for BSNL, and therefore not liable to service tax, was raised for the first time in appeal. A prima facie case for complete waiver was not shown, so unconditional waiver was declined; however, pre-deposit was waived on deposit of Rs. 1 lakh and recovery of the remaining tax, interest and penalties was stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 09:32:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1082 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148422</link>
      <description>A 26-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned after the appellant attributed it to handling of papers by counsel&#039;s staff and serious illness. On interim relief, the assessee&#039;s request for unconditional waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery failed because the contention that the construction was for BSNL, and therefore not liable to service tax, was raised for the first time in appeal. A prima facie case for complete waiver was not shown, so unconditional waiver was declined; however, pre-deposit was waived on deposit of Rs. 1 lakh and recovery of the remaining tax, interest and penalties was stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>