https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148415 A limited pre-deposit was considered appropriate in a service tax appeal challenging denial of Notification No. 12/2003 benefit, because the appellant had already deposited a substantial amount and the interim order did not show a proper examination of the work orders and materials relied upon. At the stay stage, the demand was not required to be secured in full where only a prima facie review was involved. The appellant was therefore directed to deposit a further Rs. 20 lakhs, and recovery of the balance demand was stayed pending disposal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:43:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148415 A limited pre-deposit was considered appropriate in a service tax appeal challenging denial of Notification No. 12/2003 benefit, because the appellant had already deposited a substantial amount and the interim order did not show a proper examination of the work orders and materials relied upon. At the stay stage, the demand was not required to be secured in full where only a prima facie review was involved. The appellant was therefore directed to deposit a further Rs. 20 lakhs, and recovery of the balance demand was stayed pending disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148415