https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148393 The court quashed the sales tax assessment orders for hill produce turnover, ruling that the levy of tax on inter-State sales under the Central Sales Tax Act was illegal. The petitioner was entitled to a refund of the tax collected under these orders, and further tax collection was restrained. The court deemed the Article 226 petition for refund maintainable, emphasizing the duty of the State to refund tax paid under a mistake of law upon proper claim within the limitation period. en-us Fri, 07 Jun 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:44:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148393 The court quashed the sales tax assessment orders for hill produce turnover, ruling that the levy of tax on inter-State sales under the Central Sales Tax Act was illegal. The petitioner was entitled to a refund of the tax collected under these orders, and further tax collection was restrained. The court deemed the Article 226 petition for refund maintainable, emphasizing the duty of the State to refund tax paid under a mistake of law upon proper claim within the limitation period. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 07 Jun 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148393