https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148387 Prima facie, the Tribunal found no adequate justification in the revision order for denying cum-tax value under the Explanation to Section 67 or for imposing penalties under Sections 77 and 78. On that assessment, it treated the differential service tax, interest, and penalty demands as fit for interim protection and granted waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal. en-us Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:26:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148387 Prima facie, the Tribunal found no adequate justification in the revision order for denying cum-tax value under the Explanation to Section 67 or for imposing penalties under Sections 77 and 78. On that assessment, it treated the differential service tax, interest, and penalty demands as fit for interim protection and granted waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148387