<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (2) TMI 104 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148363</link>
    <description>The High Court, in a reference under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, determined that transactions involving charmed tawiz were not sales of chattels under the Act. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the respondent did not qualify as a dealer as per the Act&#039;s definition. Emphasizing the importance of specific case facts, the Court directed the Commissioner of Sales Tax to pay costs. The judgment underscored the need to consider factual admissions in deciding tax law applicability in similar situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:34:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (2) TMI 104 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148363</link>
      <description>The High Court, in a reference under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, determined that transactions involving charmed tawiz were not sales of chattels under the Act. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the respondent did not qualify as a dealer as per the Act&#039;s definition. Emphasizing the importance of specific case facts, the Court directed the Commissioner of Sales Tax to pay costs. The judgment underscored the need to consider factual admissions in deciding tax law applicability in similar situations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>