<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 725 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148344</link>
    <description>The Bench granted complete waiver of pre-deposit of the service tax amounts confirmed by the lower authority and stayed the recovery until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The stay petition was allowed, with the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding &#039;Port Services&#039; and &#039;Customs House Agent&#039; services being considered. The Bench established a prima facie case for waiver of the disputed amounts related to &#039;Port Services&#039; based on previous decisions in favor of the appellant. Additionally, it was concluded that the appellant should only pay service tax on the commission amount for CHA services, leading to a waiver of the differential duty confirmed by the lower authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 725 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148344</link>
      <description>The Bench granted complete waiver of pre-deposit of the service tax amounts confirmed by the lower authority and stayed the recovery until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The stay petition was allowed, with the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding &#039;Port Services&#039; and &#039;Customs House Agent&#039; services being considered. The Bench established a prima facie case for waiver of the disputed amounts related to &#039;Port Services&#039; based on previous decisions in favor of the appellant. Additionally, it was concluded that the appellant should only pay service tax on the commission amount for CHA services, leading to a waiver of the differential duty confirmed by the lower authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>