<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (6) TMI 49 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148342</link>
    <description>The Court held that the preparation &quot;Ipco Dental Creamy Snuff&quot; fell within the definition of tobacco under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, despite the addition of other substances. Consequently, it was classified under entry 49 of the Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed incorrect, and the State was directed to bear the costs of the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:34:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (6) TMI 49 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148342</link>
      <description>The Court held that the preparation &quot;Ipco Dental Creamy Snuff&quot; fell within the definition of tobacco under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, despite the addition of other substances. Consequently, it was classified under entry 49 of the Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed incorrect, and the State was directed to bear the costs of the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>