<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (1) TMI 44 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148333</link>
    <description>An unincorporated club is within the Bombay Sales Tax Act definition of &quot;dealer&quot; only where buying or selling to members is carried on as a business with commercial character. The HC treated the inclusive reference to clubs and associations as part of that same business concept, not as a separate basis for taxation, and held that intra-member transactions are not taxable merely because they involve members. It also found that the club&#039;s supplies were not made with a profit-earning object: the activities were recreational, catering was run at a loss, and any margin was incidental to overheads and wastage. On those facts, the club was not liable to be treated as a dealer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:03:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (1) TMI 44 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148333</link>
      <description>An unincorporated club is within the Bombay Sales Tax Act definition of &quot;dealer&quot; only where buying or selling to members is carried on as a business with commercial character. The HC treated the inclusive reference to clubs and associations as part of that same business concept, not as a separate basis for taxation, and held that intra-member transactions are not taxable merely because they involve members. It also found that the club&#039;s supplies were not made with a profit-earning object: the activities were recreational, catering was run at a loss, and any margin was incidental to overheads and wastage. On those facts, the club was not liable to be treated as a dealer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>