<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 955 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148328</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for waiver of pre-deposit of remaining service tax and penalty amounts, staying the recovery of the balance pending appeal disposal. The appellant, a Govt. of India Undertaking, successfully argued that their services were not categorized as photography or consultancy services for service tax liability, supported by relevant circulars and definitions. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s activities did not fall under photography services and that the service tax net did not cover their services for a specific period, considering the substantial amount already deposited as sufficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:39:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 955 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148328</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for waiver of pre-deposit of remaining service tax and penalty amounts, staying the recovery of the balance pending appeal disposal. The appellant, a Govt. of India Undertaking, successfully argued that their services were not categorized as photography or consultancy services for service tax liability, supported by relevant circulars and definitions. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s activities did not fall under photography services and that the service tax net did not cover their services for a specific period, considering the substantial amount already deposited as sufficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>