<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (1) TMI 42 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148325</link>
    <description>Rebate under section 15 was treated as available where tax was paid in time and the return, though filed one day late, was accepted without best judgment assessment, supporting an implied extension of the filing period. The filing deadline was viewed as relevant to rebate administration, not as an absolute bar destroying substantive entitlement. The proviso to section 7(2)(b) was confined to sales of goods purchased for resale or packing without manufacture, and did not extend to the sale price of bran manufactured from tax-free raw wheat. Manufactured product proceeds could not be added to taxable turnover under that proviso.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:03:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (1) TMI 42 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148325</link>
      <description>Rebate under section 15 was treated as available where tax was paid in time and the return, though filed one day late, was accepted without best judgment assessment, supporting an implied extension of the filing period. The filing deadline was viewed as relevant to rebate administration, not as an absolute bar destroying substantive entitlement. The proviso to section 7(2)(b) was confined to sales of goods purchased for resale or packing without manufacture, and did not extend to the sale price of bran manufactured from tax-free raw wheat. Manufactured product proceeds could not be added to taxable turnover under that proviso.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>