<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1074 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148312</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh consideration on the merits. The appeal was deemed within the time limit due to uncertainties surrounding the service of the Order-In-Original (OIO) to the appellant. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of evaluating the case on substantive grounds rather than solely on procedural aspects, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:40:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1074 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148312</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh consideration on the merits. The appeal was deemed within the time limit due to uncertainties surrounding the service of the Order-In-Original (OIO) to the appellant. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of evaluating the case on substantive grounds rather than solely on procedural aspects, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>