<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (7) TMI 115 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148302</link>
    <description>A sale is inter-State only where the contract of sale itself requires movement of goods across State boundaries in fulfilment of that sale. Here, the contracts provided for delivery at Katangi within the State, with the buyer taking delivery there and arranging further despatch; the later weighment at Gondia was only for price ascertainment and did not amount to a stipulation for delivery outside the State. The movement from Katangi to Gondia was therefore not incident to the sale, and a payment condition linked to weighment did not convert the local sale into an inter-State sale. The court treated the transactions as intra-State sales taxable under the State enactment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:35:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (7) TMI 115 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148302</link>
      <description>A sale is inter-State only where the contract of sale itself requires movement of goods across State boundaries in fulfilment of that sale. Here, the contracts provided for delivery at Katangi within the State, with the buyer taking delivery there and arranging further despatch; the later weighment at Gondia was only for price ascertainment and did not amount to a stipulation for delivery outside the State. The movement from Katangi to Gondia was therefore not incident to the sale, and a payment condition linked to weighment did not convert the local sale into an inter-State sale. The court treated the transactions as intra-State sales taxable under the State enactment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>