<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (1) TMI 73 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148296</link>
    <description>The amended definition of &quot;dealer&quot; under the Bihar Sales Tax Act was read harmoniously with the statute as a whole, so the substitution of &quot;sells or supplies any goods&quot; did not automatically tax every isolated transaction. The surrounding charging, procedural and turnover provisions continued to use the concept of business, indicating that the wider wording was confined to sales connected with business, including the added categories of contract business and Government sales. In a taxing statute, any new burden must be expressed clearly, and ambiguity is resolved in favour of the subject. A casual sale unconnected with business was therefore outside the amended definition and not liable to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:06:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (1) TMI 73 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148296</link>
      <description>The amended definition of &quot;dealer&quot; under the Bihar Sales Tax Act was read harmoniously with the statute as a whole, so the substitution of &quot;sells or supplies any goods&quot; did not automatically tax every isolated transaction. The surrounding charging, procedural and turnover provisions continued to use the concept of business, indicating that the wider wording was confined to sales connected with business, including the added categories of contract business and Government sales. In a taxing statute, any new burden must be expressed clearly, and ambiguity is resolved in favour of the subject. A casual sale unconnected with business was therefore outside the amended definition and not liable to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>