<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (4) TMI 188 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148295</link>
    <description>Braided cord was treated as a textile within entry 4 of the Third Schedule to the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, because the entry uses broad language covering all varieties of textiles and includes illustrative items such as handkerchiefs, towels, niwars and laces. The determining test was the ordinary commercial meaning of textile, and braided cord, made by braiding threads into an interlocking form, satisfied that description. The narrower argument that it must qualify only as &quot;laces&quot; was rejected, since that word was used in its common ornamental sense. The schedule exclusions did not cover braided cord, so it remained entitled to exemption from sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:03:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (4) TMI 188 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148295</link>
      <description>Braided cord was treated as a textile within entry 4 of the Third Schedule to the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, because the entry uses broad language covering all varieties of textiles and includes illustrative items such as handkerchiefs, towels, niwars and laces. The determining test was the ordinary commercial meaning of textile, and braided cord, made by braiding threads into an interlocking form, satisfied that description. The narrower argument that it must qualify only as &quot;laces&quot; was rejected, since that word was used in its common ornamental sense. The schedule exclusions did not cover braided cord, so it remained entitled to exemption from sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>