<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (7) TMI 72 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148260</link>
    <description>Packing materials used only after boot polish is manufactured do not qualify as raw material for concessional sales tax treatment under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. Raw material was confined to articles used as ingredients in the manufactured goods or consumed in the manufacturing process, and manufacture was limited to producing, collecting, extracting, preparing or making goods. Tin-dibbies, cartons, aluminium-foils, box-board and gray-board were used merely for packing and sale facilitation, not in the manufacture itself. Their inclusion in the registration certificate was therefore rightly refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:59:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (7) TMI 72 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148260</link>
      <description>Packing materials used only after boot polish is manufactured do not qualify as raw material for concessional sales tax treatment under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. Raw material was confined to articles used as ingredients in the manufactured goods or consumed in the manufacturing process, and manufacture was limited to producing, collecting, extracting, preparing or making goods. Tin-dibbies, cartons, aluminium-foils, box-board and gray-board were used merely for packing and sale facilitation, not in the manufacture itself. Their inclusion in the registration certificate was therefore rightly refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>