<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (8) TMI 105 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148254</link>
    <description>A composite contract for installation work with supply and fixing of electrical goods could not be split into a separate sale for sales tax purposes unless there was a distinct contract for sale of specific goods for a price and property in those goods passed under that contract. Materials consumed in execution of work did not become taxable as a sale merely because they were supplied and used. The authorities had no finding of a separate sale contract and could not reconstruct one from a consolidated works contract. On that basis, the attempted separation was held invalid, the assessment orders were set aside, and the deposited amounts were refundable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (8) TMI 105 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148254</link>
      <description>A composite contract for installation work with supply and fixing of electrical goods could not be split into a separate sale for sales tax purposes unless there was a distinct contract for sale of specific goods for a price and property in those goods passed under that contract. Materials consumed in execution of work did not become taxable as a sale merely because they were supplied and used. The authorities had no finding of a separate sale contract and could not reconstruct one from a consolidated works contract. On that basis, the attempted separation was held invalid, the assessment orders were set aside, and the deposited amounts were refundable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>