<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (7) TMI 106 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148250</link>
    <description>Penalty under the best judgment penalty provision was confined to turnover items actually assessed on best judgment, and a merely incomplete or incorrect return did not by itself attract penalty. Items 1 and 3 were accepted from the assessee&#039;s own account books without estimation, so they fell outside the statutory field for penalty and no penalty was sustainable on those turnovers. Item 2 was assessed on best judgment after the assessee invited that method, bringing it within the provision; penalty was valid only for that item.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:53:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (7) TMI 106 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148250</link>
      <description>Penalty under the best judgment penalty provision was confined to turnover items actually assessed on best judgment, and a merely incomplete or incorrect return did not by itself attract penalty. Items 1 and 3 were accepted from the assessee&#039;s own account books without estimation, so they fell outside the statutory field for penalty and no penalty was sustainable on those turnovers. Item 2 was assessed on best judgment after the assessee invited that method, bringing it within the provision; penalty was valid only for that item.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=148250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>