<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 291 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=147235</link>
    <description>SC held that the tax demand complied with section 143(3) where the Income-tax Officer had signed the computation form (I.T.N.S. 150), so the assessment order was not vitiated and leave was denied; petitions dismissed. The Court recommended that the Department either incorporate full tax calculations in I.T.N.S. 65 or make I.T.N.S. 150 an annexure signed by the Officer and served with the assessment order to provide assessees necessary details for appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 291 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=147235</link>
      <description>SC held that the tax demand complied with section 143(3) where the Income-tax Officer had signed the computation form (I.T.N.S. 150), so the assessment order was not vitiated and leave was denied; petitions dismissed. The Court recommended that the Department either incorporate full tax calculations in I.T.N.S. 65 or make I.T.N.S. 150 an annexure signed by the Officer and served with the assessment order to provide assessees necessary details for appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=147235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>