<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (12) TMI 60 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146242</link>
    <description>Section 3 of the Kerala Sales Tax (Levy and Validation) Act, 1965 was construed as a substantive charging provision that retrospectively imposed tax liability on purchases of copra and cashew-nut kernel for 1 April 1958 to 31 March 1963, and that retrospective operation was upheld as a valid legislative exercise. Section 4 was read as a validating clause effective only within the limits of the liability created by section 3: it validated prior levies, assessments and collections without creating an independent or unlimited retrospective levy. On that construction, the scheme did not offend Article 14 or impermissibly encroach on judicial power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:17:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (12) TMI 60 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146242</link>
      <description>Section 3 of the Kerala Sales Tax (Levy and Validation) Act, 1965 was construed as a substantive charging provision that retrospectively imposed tax liability on purchases of copra and cashew-nut kernel for 1 April 1958 to 31 March 1963, and that retrospective operation was upheld as a valid legislative exercise. Section 4 was read as a validating clause effective only within the limits of the liability created by section 3: it validated prior levies, assessments and collections without creating an independent or unlimited retrospective levy. On that construction, the scheme did not offend Article 14 or impermissibly encroach on judicial power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>