<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (8) TMI 57 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146233</link>
    <description>Statutory control over the supply, price, allocation, and purchaser of iron and steel does not by itself prevent a transaction from being a sale in law. The legal concept of &quot;sale of goods&quot; still requires an agreement to sell, money consideration, and transfer of property, but those elements can exist despite control order restrictions. On the facts described, the transactions involved offer, scrutiny by the Controller, acceptance by the producer, issue of works orders, despatch of goods, and payment within controlled limits, so they were treated as sales exigible to tax under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. Earlier decisions were distinguished where contractual volition or agreement for sale was absent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:09:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (8) TMI 57 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146233</link>
      <description>Statutory control over the supply, price, allocation, and purchaser of iron and steel does not by itself prevent a transaction from being a sale in law. The legal concept of &quot;sale of goods&quot; still requires an agreement to sell, money consideration, and transfer of property, but those elements can exist despite control order restrictions. On the facts described, the transactions involved offer, scrutiny by the Controller, acceptance by the producer, issue of works orders, despatch of goods, and payment within controlled limits, so they were treated as sales exigible to tax under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. Earlier decisions were distinguished where contractual volition or agreement for sale was absent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>