<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (2) TMI 70 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146231</link>
    <description>Section 25(1) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 creates an express prohibition against disclosure of specified returns, statements and related materials, including production before a court, and section 25(3) lifts that protection only where the documents are required for a prosecution under the Indian Penal Code or the Sales Tax Act in respect of those documents. The provision was construed strictly: returns of non-accused dealers and correspondence files linked to protected assessment material remained privileged, while departmental registers, seized documents not produced in tax proceedings, surrendered blank declaration forms, and assessment orders outside the protected class were not covered. Disclosure was therefore allowed only for the non-privileged documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:55:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (2) TMI 70 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146231</link>
      <description>Section 25(1) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 creates an express prohibition against disclosure of specified returns, statements and related materials, including production before a court, and section 25(3) lifts that protection only where the documents are required for a prosecution under the Indian Penal Code or the Sales Tax Act in respect of those documents. The provision was construed strictly: returns of non-accused dealers and correspondence files linked to protected assessment material remained privileged, while departmental registers, seized documents not produced in tax proceedings, surrendered blank declaration forms, and assessment orders outside the protected class were not covered. Disclosure was therefore allowed only for the non-privileged documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>