<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (8) TMI 56 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145225</link>
    <description>Agricultural produce retains exemption from sales tax where only the minimum processing necessary to make it marketable or fit for consumption is applied and its substantial identity remains intact. The Madras HC held that dehusking, drying and cleaning of arecanuts grown by the seller did not amount to such processing as would take them outside the exemption for agricultural or horticultural produce under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959. Dehusking merely preserved the essential character of the produce and did not convert it into a different commercial product, so the sale proceeds of the arecanuts remained exempt from tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:34:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (8) TMI 56 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145225</link>
      <description>Agricultural produce retains exemption from sales tax where only the minimum processing necessary to make it marketable or fit for consumption is applied and its substantial identity remains intact. The Madras HC held that dehusking, drying and cleaning of arecanuts grown by the seller did not amount to such processing as would take them outside the exemption for agricultural or horticultural produce under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959. Dehusking merely preserved the essential character of the produce and did not convert it into a different commercial product, so the sale proceeds of the arecanuts remained exempt from tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=145225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>